Archive for the ‘Evaluation’ Category

October 28, 2010 6

Alt-metrics: A manifesto

By in Evaluation, Social Media, Statistics, Web 2.0

Tweet J. Priem, D. Taraborelli, P. Groth, C. Neylon (2010), Alt-metrics: A manifesto, (v.1.0), 26 October 2010. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto No one can read everything. We rely on filters to make sense of the scholarly literature, but the narrow, traditional filters are being swamped. However, the growth of new, online scholarly tools allows us to make new [...]

Tags: , , , , ,

September 15, 2009 6

Portrait of the scientist as a bureaucrat

By in Evaluation, Funding, Jobs, Writing

Tweet Cambridge zoologist Peter A. Lawrence has published a thoughtful piece on the frustration of scientists (whether young or not so young) facing the ruthlessness of the research granting system (Real Lives and White Lies in the Funding of Scientific Research). He suggests how a “drastic simplification of this grant-writing process would help scientists return [...]

Tags: , , ,

August 28, 2009 4

Benjamin Franklin: the grandfather of personal productivity?

By in Evaluation, Time management

Tweet A few years ago I visited the Huntington Library in Los Angeles. We spent most of our time poking around the beautiful gardens, enjoying the Californian sun. But the Library collection is pretty remarkable too and it holds copies of the Gutenberg bible, Audubon’s bird drawings, early Shakespeare editions and – a definite highlight [...]

Tags: ,

August 20, 2009 5

Nascent: Igor – a Google Wave robot to manage your references

By in Collaboration, e-Science, Evaluation, FOSS, Software, Web 2.0, Writing

Tweet Looks like the Connotea team is on the right track. Instead of trying to bolt something to insert references into word, they are trying to go straight to wave. We have blogged before about what a good integration between references and writing tools should look like, and quite honestly, Igor looks like it’s really [...]

August 18, 2009 2

Study Hacks on Rethinking What Impresses Employers and being a hyperspecialist

By in Evaluation, Jobs, Opinion

Tweet Cal Newport says people think that the more hard things they do, the more impressive they’ll be to potential employers. He calls this the diligence hypothesis. This is a leitmotiv in his blogging. However, this trend of getting (and looking!) as busy as possible is not exclusive to undergrads (his audience). I don’t know [...]