The right tool for the job

Following my earlier post on using numbered folders to keep track of your projects, I received a couple emails from readers wondering what software I use to implement the system. As a quick recap, the idea was that you create a single projects folder and in that directory, every new project goes into its own sequentially numbered folder. Then – and here’s the key bit – you use a file of some sort to keep track of these ids and any associated meta-data (e.g. titles, status, todos).

In this post, I want to review the basic tools for storing key indexed data and the pros and cons of each technology. Being productive is largely about using the right tools for the job and the numbered folders problem is no different. So below I’ll review what I see as the four basic options and how they can be used generally and for the numbered folders technique.

[Read more...]

Is Google Chrome going to be the Firefox killer?

Google is going to release in the coming hours what looks like a revolutionary new entry in the browser arena: Google Chrome. The GUI design and engineering effort behind Google Chrome looks impressive. What is more, Chrome is going to be released under an open source license.

In spite of the sugary rhetoric (“it’s in our interest to make the internet better”– yeah, thanks Google), is this going to be the ultimate Firefox killer? And how will this affect the landscape of open source development altogether?

Using EndNote with LaTeX

For most academics, the standard reference management software is EndNote. It lets you keep track of all the journal articles, books, web sites, etc. that you have read and might want to cite in your papers, integrating easily with Microsoft Word to create properly formatted citations and bibliographies.

But what do you do if you use LaTeX not Word to write your papers? Traditionally BibTeX comes to rescue. It uses a formatted plain-text file to store references and with the custom-bib and natbib packages, creating citations and bibliographies is fairly painless. You can even use a graphical editor like JabRef to help manage your BibTeX database.

However there can be problems when collaborating with people who use Word. How do you share your BibTeX references with EndNote users or vice versa?

[Read more...]

Numbered folders: the easiest way to keep track of works-in-progress

Even if you’re not familiar with the daily life of an academic, chances are you will have heard the expression “Publish or perish”. In my (limited) experience, it’s not as bad as it sounds since people who end up in academia tend to have lots of ideas and like to share them with other people. In this case, writing a paper may be a bit time-consuming but it’s really just an extension of the brainstorming you do all the time. However the problem comes when trying to keep track of your various ideas. It’s very rare that one project finishes neatly before the next begins and so a person needs a way of keeping tabs on multiple projects at once.

The approach I’ve been using is borrowed from an engineering firm I used to work for. [Read more...]

We are now a^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H productivity blog

I always wondered how people see the academic world from outside. How do we gauge the interest of the general public on what academics have to say (on average)? One easy way to look at this question is to see the how often people will read an article that has the word ‘academic’ on it.

A proxy on what people read nowadays is digg.com. And the tool to see how often people digg academic posts is now available in Dan Zarella’s blog. Given a keyword, the tool will return data on the average number of links accumulated by stories popular on Digg that mentioned that keyword. This is done with 2007 data.

Well, behold what happens when you enter “academic”:

clipboard2_21_2008 _ 19_07_34

And compare it to what you get when you type “productivity”:image

Why is this important? Well, on average, a single digg increases traffic by 0.10%. So a story that gets 3,000 diggs results in an increase in total traffic to the referring site by 300%.

So, from now on we are a^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H productivity blog :)