<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RWW on Elsevier&#8217;s Prototype: Is This The Scientific Article of the Future?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/</link>
	<description>A survival guide for the 21st century researcher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Islamic Forex</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-139084</link>
		<dc:creator>Islamic Forex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 20:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/#comment-139084</guid>
		<description>Hi! Thanks for your interesting post.your thoughts about &quot;how to get our stuff in front of the eyes of the general public, with their ever-decreasing attention span,&quot; are acceptable. Though PDF is boring it  gives viewers a comfortable and simple way to share any  Windows document.  when reading and accessing large scientific matters s on the web,Dynamic papers are  needed. It&#039;s really glad to read  this  which has enhanced my knowledge regarding topic.Thank Q again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! Thanks for your interesting post.your thoughts about &#8220;how to get our stuff in front of the eyes of the general public, with their ever-decreasing attention span,&#8221; are acceptable. Though PDF is boring it  gives viewers a comfortable and simple way to share any  Windows document.  when reading and accessing large scientific matters s on the web,Dynamic papers are  needed. It&#8217;s really glad to read  this  which has enhanced my knowledge regarding topic.Thank Q again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Academic Productivity &#187; The Future of the Journal, by Anita de Waard</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-126197</link>
		<dc:creator>Academic Productivity &#187; The Future of the Journal, by Anita de Waard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/#comment-126197</guid>
		<description>[...] publishing industry has at least one person (Anita) that gets it makes me feel good. Looks like Elsevier has a head-start. If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] publishing industry has at least one person (Anita) that gets it makes me feel good. Looks like Elsevier has a head-start. If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Academic Productivity &#187; Review of Google Wave as a scholarly HTML editor</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-95040</link>
		<dc:creator>Academic Productivity &#187; Review of Google Wave as a scholarly HTML editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/#comment-95040</guid>
		<description>[...] one, but that adds little value. We are equaled in terms of tools. However, publishers such as Elsevier want to get away from the paper metaphor (which is a good thing). As a consequence, authors will not be able to produce HTML as rich as the publisherâ€™s. Here, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one, but that adds little value. We are equaled in terms of tools. However, publishers such as Elsevier want to get away from the paper metaphor (which is a good thing). As a consequence, authors will not be able to produce HTML as rich as the publisherâ€™s. Here, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free college admission essays</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-82687</link>
		<dc:creator>free college admission essays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/#comment-82687</guid>
		<description>â€œA figure that contains clickable areas so that it can be used as a navigation mechanism to directly access specific sub-sections of the results and figuresâ€

This is a very useful feature, especially when reading and accessing lengthy scientific papers with various sub-sections on the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œA figure that contains clickable areas so that it can be used as a navigation mechanism to directly access specific sub-sections of the results and figuresâ€</p>
<p>This is a very useful feature, especially when reading and accessing lengthy scientific papers with various sub-sections on the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-78449</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/#comment-78449</guid>
		<description>I find the tabbed interface annoying. I don&#039;t like having to click the tabs and it makes it difficult to find a particular phrase, word or quote since you have to run a text search several times on each of the different tabs. Also, I find the traditional long page is easier for a quick read/scan. They could have made a single page with links to various sections on the side or something similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the tabbed interface annoying. I don&#8217;t like having to click the tabs and it makes it difficult to find a particular phrase, word or quote since you have to run a text search several times on each of the different tabs. Also, I find the traditional long page is easier for a quick read/scan. They could have made a single page with links to various sections on the side or something similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mature cougars</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-77780</link>
		<dc:creator>mature cougars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/#comment-77780</guid>
		<description>&quot;On the other hand, if we want to compete for the attention of the general public, this is woefully inadequate.&quot;

It is good to know that Elsevier recognizes that there is a need for improvement in academic publishing. Perhaps with articles like this, Elsevier will be guided to the more effective strategies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On the other hand, if we want to compete for the attention of the general public, this is woefully inadequate.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is good to know that Elsevier recognizes that there is a need for improvement in academic publishing. Perhaps with articles like this, Elsevier will be guided to the more effective strategies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juli overzicht &#171; Dee&#8217;tjes</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-76244</link>
		<dc:creator>Juli overzicht &#171; Dee&#8217;tjes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 04:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/#comment-76244</guid>
		<description>[...] RWW on Elsevierâ€™s Prototype: Is This The Scientific Article of the Future? (Academic productivity)... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RWW on Elsevierâ€™s Prototype: Is This The Scientific Article of the Future? (Academic productivity)&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-75362</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 05:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/#comment-75362</guid>
		<description>I am quite leery of new formats by content companies. It seems they are usually ways of locking content down so that you cannot access it/save it/alter it without the company&#039;s permission. PDFs are boring but they are a relatively open format that can be downloaded and stored on the computer and even emailed to colleagues. I wonder if a part of the new format will involve keeping the content exclusively on Elsevier&#039;s webpage so that you or your University must have a paid subscription for continued access.

I continue to wonder what the purpose of journals is. Much of the function of the journal could be replicated in an online-only format run by researchers with the help of a few web techs and format editors. It seems like journals just make money by forcing you to hand over the copyright for work that was probably publicly funded and then locking down that work in order to sell it back to you and the rest of the public. The whole system seems rather parasitic as the journals don&#039;t create the content they just benefit from the public funding and creative work of researchers. I hope we will find a better system soon that will open content to the public that payed for the work to be done in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am quite leery of new formats by content companies. It seems they are usually ways of locking content down so that you cannot access it/save it/alter it without the company&#8217;s permission. PDFs are boring but they are a relatively open format that can be downloaded and stored on the computer and even emailed to colleagues. I wonder if a part of the new format will involve keeping the content exclusively on Elsevier&#8217;s webpage so that you or your University must have a paid subscription for continued access.</p>
<p>I continue to wonder what the purpose of journals is. Much of the function of the journal could be replicated in an online-only format run by researchers with the help of a few web techs and format editors. It seems like journals just make money by forcing you to hand over the copyright for work that was probably publicly funded and then locking down that work in order to sell it back to you and the rest of the public. The whole system seems rather parasitic as the journals don&#8217;t create the content they just benefit from the public funding and creative work of researchers. I hope we will find a better system soon that will open content to the public that payed for the work to be done in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-74447</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/#comment-74447</guid>
		<description>Dynamic papers are a step but more is needed.  Stack overflow is an excellent example of applying good ideas well.  The difference between excellent sites like stack overflow and others is not just the big ideas it is excellent execution of many many small details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dynamic papers are a step but more is needed.  Stack overflow is an excellent example of applying good ideas well.  The difference between excellent sites like stack overflow and others is not just the big ideas it is excellent execution of many many small details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-74438</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/2009/rww-on-elseviers-prototype-is-this-the-scientific-article-of-the-future/#comment-74438</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post and the sites you linked to.

Having dynamic papers will be very important in the future, but right now it may not be the thing to focus on.  The example of the audio interview seems pointless.  But in the future an embed 3d model that is capable of being manipulated would be exciting.

Right now, I just would like scientific papers to be more easily accessible.  As an undergrad just starting on research, I find myself spending more time searching and getting around the databases than I do actually reading material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post and the sites you linked to.</p>
<p>Having dynamic papers will be very important in the future, but right now it may not be the thing to focus on.  The example of the audio interview seems pointless.  But in the future an embed 3d model that is capable of being manipulated would be exciting.</p>
<p>Right now, I just would like scientific papers to be more easily accessible.  As an undergrad just starting on research, I find myself spending more time searching and getting around the databases than I do actually reading material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

