<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Use the new ap.com 2.0 superpowers: make a comment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.academicproductivity.com/2008/use-the-new-apcom-20-superpowers-make-a-comment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2008/use-the-new-apcom-20-superpowers-make-a-comment/</link>
	<description>A survival guide for the 21st century researcher</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jose</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2008/use-the-new-apcom-20-superpowers-make-a-comment/#comment-20137</link>
		<dc:creator>jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2008/use-the-new-apcom-20-superpowers-make-a-comment/#comment-20137</guid>
		<description>"Have a fair portion of RSS subscribers commented?"
This is a good question, but I don't think it can be answered... RSS subscrbers are anonymous. No way to link them back to their comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Have a fair portion of RSS subscribers commented?&#8221;<br />
This is a good question, but I don&#8217;t think it can be answered&#8230; RSS subscrbers are anonymous. No way to link them back to their comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr. gunn</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2008/use-the-new-apcom-20-superpowers-make-a-comment/#comment-20132</link>
		<dc:creator>mr. gunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2008/use-the-new-apcom-20-superpowers-make-a-comment/#comment-20132</guid>
		<description>"But it seems that most users (yes, users, not readers) didn’t really take advantage of the new features."

I see this claim a lot, and I've never totally sure how people measure this.  It's not as simple as Unique visits/usage of features because skimmers, as opposed to return visitors or RSS subscribers, aren't even interested in contributing and shouldn't be included.

Have a fair portion of RSS subscribers commented?

I have a fair number of RSS subscribers, but not a great deal of comments on average.  I don't know if this is really even a metric to worry about, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But it seems that most users (yes, users, not readers) didn’t really take advantage of the new features.&#8221;</p>
<p>I see this claim a lot, and I&#8217;ve never totally sure how people measure this.  It&#8217;s not as simple as Unique visits/usage of features because skimmers, as opposed to return visitors or RSS subscribers, aren&#8217;t even interested in contributing and shouldn&#8217;t be included.</p>
<p>Have a fair portion of RSS subscribers commented?</p>
<p>I have a fair number of RSS subscribers, but not a great deal of comments on average.  I don&#8217;t know if this is really even a metric to worry about, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
