<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attention economy: ROI for your attention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.academicproductivity.com/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/</link>
	<description>A survival guide for the 21st century researcher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who does Google think you are?</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-149267</link>
		<dc:creator>Who does Google think you are?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/#comment-149267</guid>
		<description>[...] of the themes we&#8217;ve been discussing here is the idea that prestige and attention are the main currencies of academia. So it only makes sense that you want your online presence to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the themes we&#8217;ve been discussing here is the idea that prestige and attention are the main currencies of academia. So it only makes sense that you want your online presence to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Academic Productivity &#187; A general model of productivity?</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-68799</link>
		<dc:creator>Academic Productivity &#187; A general model of productivity?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/#comment-68799</guid>
		<description>[...] Attention economy: ROI for your attention [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Attention economy: ROI for your attention [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apex Professionals LLC</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-54346</link>
		<dc:creator>Apex Professionals LLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 03:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/#comment-54346</guid>
		<description>Came across your post while googling the current state of our economy. Though its an old posting I still found it to be a very interesting read :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came across your post while googling the current state of our economy. Though its an old posting I still found it to be a very interesting read <img src='http://www.academicproductivity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NLP Practitioner</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-48548</link>
		<dc:creator>NLP Practitioner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/#comment-48548</guid>
		<description>I agree, there is too much focus (attention) on negativity. We should focus on the positive more as a society for best results</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, there is too much focus (attention) on negativity. We should focus on the positive more as a society for best results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-39506</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 00:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/#comment-39506</guid>
		<description>I loved your analytical approach !

Devin Willis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved your analytical approach !</p>
<p>Devin Willis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Rene Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-38888</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Rene Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/#comment-38888</guid>
		<description>I agree that we allocate too much attention on small decisions and not enough on the big ones.  This is one of the problems with our society - we are expected to be perfect, and only hear from some people - bosses, creditors, family - when something is wrong or there has been a perceived slight.  We don&#039;t get enough praise for what we do right.  So we never know what conduct of ours is going to come back and embarrass or bite us next.  Amidst a society that focuses on the negative, things get blurred and it&#039;s hard to prioritize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that we allocate too much attention on small decisions and not enough on the big ones.  This is one of the problems with our society &#8211; we are expected to be perfect, and only hear from some people &#8211; bosses, creditors, family &#8211; when something is wrong or there has been a perceived slight.  We don&#8217;t get enough praise for what we do right.  So we never know what conduct of ours is going to come back and embarrass or bite us next.  Amidst a society that focuses on the negative, things get blurred and it&#8217;s hard to prioritize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Academic Productivity &#187; The failure of open science</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-34552</link>
		<dc:creator>Academic Productivity &#187; The failure of open science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/#comment-34552</guid>
		<description>[...] Attention economy: ROI for your attention [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Attention economy: ROI for your attention [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-30811</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/#comment-30811</guid>
		<description>It is interesting to note your very analytical sense of time invested. However, I wanted to point out a comment you made: &quot;What is the right balance between high-risk, high-yield activities (you know which ones those are in your field!) and the off-the-mill paper-churning ideas that get you by?&quot; I believe everyone has a natural gauge of what activities are required to get by, however so many of the great academics (Einstein is a prime example), were seemingly not as concerned with this concept of resource allocation. Many solely focused on their high risk and high yield time investments. I guess just like in a traditional stock portfolio, one has to analyze their own risk assessment and &quot;diversify&quot; with activities accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to note your very analytical sense of time invested. However, I wanted to point out a comment you made: &#8220;What is the right balance between high-risk, high-yield activities (you know which ones those are in your field!) and the off-the-mill paper-churning ideas that get you by?&#8221; I believe everyone has a natural gauge of what activities are required to get by, however so many of the great academics (Einstein is a prime example), were seemingly not as concerned with this concept of resource allocation. Many solely focused on their high risk and high yield time investments. I guess just like in a traditional stock portfolio, one has to analyze their own risk assessment and &#8220;diversify&#8221; with activities accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-13238</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/#comment-13238</guid>
		<description>Good post.

Bill Sternberg and Todd Lubart (writing well before the phrase &quot;attention economy&quot; was the new hotness) forwarded a similar idea to what you discuss here.  In their &quot;investment theory of creativity,&quot; they suggest that creative people &quot;buy low and sell high&quot; in the realm of ideas, investing time and energy into improving, combining, and then publicizing interesting-but-unpopular ideas.   As the ideas gain acceptance, they recoup their investment.  I think it&#039;s a useful perspective, and has affected the way I think about academic production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.</p>
<p>Bill Sternberg and Todd Lubart (writing well before the phrase &#8220;attention economy&#8221; was the new hotness) forwarded a similar idea to what you discuss here.  In their &#8220;investment theory of creativity,&#8221; they suggest that creative people &#8220;buy low and sell high&#8221; in the realm of ideas, investing time and energy into improving, combining, and then publicizing interesting-but-unpopular ideas.   As the ideas gain acceptance, they recoup their investment.  I think it&#8217;s a useful perspective, and has affected the way I think about academic production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dario</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-13222</link>
		<dc:creator>dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 01:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2007/attention-economy-roi-for-your-attention/#comment-13222</guid>
		<description>Man you&#039;ve been busy writing, I&#039;m reading you over the weekend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man you&#8217;ve been busy writing, I&#8217;m reading you over the weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

