<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does technology make academics more productive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.academicproductivity.com/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/</link>
	<description>A survival guide for the 21st century researcher</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terminal Block</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-20339</link>
		<dc:creator>Terminal Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-20339</guid>
		<description>will help the society advance,including academic of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will help the society advance,including academic of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-19328</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-19328</guid>
		<description>Sure. Technology will help the society advance,including academic of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure. Technology will help the society advance,including academic of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothée</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothée</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>So true!

I said the same things (or nearly the same) about students in my blog (http://www.le-doc.info/index.php/2007/01/07/91-la-technologie-nous-rend-elle-plus-productifs in french)

Consider it as a "manual trackback"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true!</p>
<p>I said the same things (or nearly the same) about students in my blog (http://www.le-doc.info/index.php/2007/01/07/91-la-technologie-nous-rend-elle-plus-productifs in french)</p>
<p>Consider it as a &#8220;manual trackback&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: academic productivity &#187; Information glut and hypertext sickness</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>academic productivity &#187; Information glut and hypertext sickness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] In my last post, I discussed the double edged sword of technology for productivity, and how information load makes technology indispensable for managing that load. With information glut the problem is largely self inflicted, and the solutions don&#8217;t all rely on technology. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In my last post, I discussed the double edged sword of technology for productivity, and how information load makes technology indispensable for managing that load. With information glut the problem is largely self inflicted, and the solutions don&#8217;t all rely on technology. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jose</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex,

Ah, the screen quest! The best solution I have found is a 1400 x 1050 14' laptop screen (pixels are tiny) with a 3M filter. I'm considering adding a second laptop. I'm positioning the laptop vertically (easier to read papers that way). I also dislike the newer glowing screens that are so common in laptops.

Having two small 1400 x 1050 screens with filters would be quite an experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex,</p>
<p>Ah, the screen quest! The best solution I have found is a 1400 x 1050 14&#8242; laptop screen (pixels are tiny) with a 3M filter. I&#8217;m considering adding a second laptop. I&#8217;m positioning the laptop vertically (easier to read papers that way). I also dislike the newer glowing screens that are so common in laptops.</p>
<p>Having two small 1400 x 1050 screens with filters would be quite an experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Vozny</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Vozny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I would happily read PDFs from screen when new high-resolution non-glowing screens would be available (something like electronic-ink) meanwhile I will have to die from eye-strain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would happily read PDFs from screen when new high-resolution non-glowing screens would be available (something like electronic-ink) meanwhile I will have to die from eye-strain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mainemc</title>
		<link>http://www.academicproductivity.com/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>mainemc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2006/does-technology-make-academics-more-productive/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I like the three categories you cite, and think that you haven't really gone far enough. The point of information overload these days is only exacerbated by the hyper-specialization that has occurred even in "universal" sciences like chemistry and physics. You often find duplication of results, for no malicious reason at all. It's simply too hard to find information that has been worked on already.

Solutions such as DevonThink Pro are helpful, if you have a collector that does some linking between files for you. At This Particular Outliner is a nice series in which issues of information management are regularly discussed, but it seems that DTPro is one of a breed.

And yet, cyber-academic though I be (I use a Newton! ha!), I really don't like DTPro and the other similar solutions. I stick to my Finder, aliases into various folders and such. 

By the way, that's the kind of thing I would like to hear more about. Get opinionated, stop summarizing! Meaning, I guess: stop being an academic about academic productivity, and start spouting off. Ha ha. Just kidding. Sort of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the three categories you cite, and think that you haven&#8217;t really gone far enough. The point of information overload these days is only exacerbated by the hyper-specialization that has occurred even in &#8220;universal&#8221; sciences like chemistry and physics. You often find duplication of results, for no malicious reason at all. It&#8217;s simply too hard to find information that has been worked on already.</p>
<p>Solutions such as DevonThink Pro are helpful, if you have a collector that does some linking between files for you. At This Particular Outliner is a nice series in which issues of information management are regularly discussed, but it seems that DTPro is one of a breed.</p>
<p>And yet, cyber-academic though I be (I use a Newton! ha!), I really don&#8217;t like DTPro and the other similar solutions. I stick to my Finder, aliases into various folders and such. </p>
<p>By the way, that&#8217;s the kind of thing I would like to hear more about. Get opinionated, stop summarizing! Meaning, I guess: stop being an academic about academic productivity, and start spouting off. Ha ha. Just kidding. Sort of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
